Scalp Micropigmentation vs. Hair Transplant

A lot of times, people get confused about which method would be best for them to treat their hair loss and improve their appearance. The truth is that there are many options for addressing the issue of hair loss- both surgical and non-surgical. But the two popular forms are scalp micropigmentation and hair transplant.

Some men have tried using the hair transplant method to change their hair problems, particularly thinning, but not all surgeries were effective. Scalp micropigmentation, on the contrary, became popular in the last couple of years as a new method of solving this problem.

So, in this article, we are going to be looking at scalp micropigmentation vs. hair transplant to know which is better.

The procedure

Scalp micropigmentation is a non-invasive procedure which involves the use of specialized techniques to inject pigment into your scalp. Small incisions are usually made and the treatment creates an illusion that your scalp is full of hair.

Hair transplant, on the other hand, is quite invasive. It is carried out in two different ways- the follicle unit transplantation (FUT) and the follicle unit extraction (FUE). It numbs all areas that need to be tackled with the use of a local anesthetic and move a strip of scalp or follicles from the back of your head into the bald areas.

The duration

When you opt for the scalp micropigmentation, you’re expected to have 2-4 treatments and each one will last for up to 3 hours. However, there is usually a 1-4 weeks break between the first and the second treatment. This is majorly done to allow the pigment to set naturally into your skin.

The hair transplant procedure would require you to spend a whole day in the hospital. But the whole procedure lasts from 8 to 10 hours depending on the size of graft you’re getting. You’ll begin to see new hair after approximately 6-9 months.

Pain and Reaction

The scalp micropigmentation procedure is less painful compared to the procedure of a traditional tattoo. This is mainly because it is done on the skin surface, unlike traditional tattooing. So, you are likely to spend just a couple of hours feeling a bit of pain

Hair transplant, on the other hand, comes with some pain after a couple of days. This is particularly experienced after the sedative effect wears off. Although some pain management antibiotics are sometimes prescribed, still itching is a normal part of the reaction. There’s also an increased risk of infection.

Effectiveness

The scalp micropigmentation can last 10-15 years before a touch up is needed, and it looks extremely natural. It can cover your scars and hidden areas that are void of hair growth due to a certain trauma. However, it is important that you chose the best artist to achieve the best results. You can find a Top Provider in your area at http://www.teammicro.com.

Conversely, hair transplant is a permanent solution that can allow the growth of new follicles for the rest of your life. However, if you don’t do your homework, this procedure may not work for you because the rate of failure of hair transplant is very high.

Looking at all these contrasting features, you’ll agree with me that the scalp micropigmentation is more favorable in terms of the procedure, the duration, the pain, and reaction. However, make sure you consult an expert if you want to go with scalp micropigmentation as your best choice for hair loss treatment and general improvement of your appearance.

Scalp Designs

1595 Central St Stoughton,Ma 02072

http://www.scalpdesigns.com/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 + 3 =